>>> On 2/1/2007 at 9:23 AM, Tom louis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > is it possible to have a firewall send a reject instead of a drop when it > sees a push ack and is expecting an ack?
The only time I could possibly imagine the firewall trying to enforce something like that is insisting on a bare ACK after the SYN, SYN-ACK at TCP setup. Does Check Point really enforce that? B¼information contained in this e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================================================= To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the BODY of the email add: set fw-1-mailinglist nomail ================================================= To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================= If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] =================================================
