"are there any restrictions like :
could an ngx r65 smartcenter 2.4 manage a 2.6 gateway ?"

I have a ticket opened with our Security Provider for this exact scenario.  I 
will
post the response when I receive an answer from the vendor

pkc_mls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,

For a new installation, I can install secureplatform ngx r65 based on 
2.4 or 2.6 kernel.

As the 2.6 kernel based version is quite new, has anyone some feedbacks 
regarding the versions ?

I don't know how it could be possible to compare both versions, but anyway.

please don't turn the answers to the linux troll of the day, this is 
definitely not the goal of my question.

are there any restrictions like :
could an ngx r65 smartcenter 2.4 manage a 2.6 gateway ?

thanks.



Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================


       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================

Reply via email to