Thanks, is this not a minor revison upgrade, what will be the actual impact of 
doing this?





________________________________
From: pkc mls <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 15 May, 2011 10:12:13
Subject: Re: [FW-1] Solaris Checkpoint manager version R65 HFA50 and R65 HFA 70 
Nokia modules

Le 15/05/2011 09:58, Peter Addy a écrit :
> Hi,
> Just a quick question.
>
> A Checkpoint manager running R65 HFA50, and firewalls runningn R65 HFA70, is
> this supported.
>
> Just the HFA that is higher on the modules compared to the manager, so not a
> major revision just a hotfix? or is it advisable to get the manager upgraded 
to
> HFA70 before pulling in the firewalls,
>
it's definitely not recommended to run a lowest HFA on the smartcenter;
you have to run at least the same release on the smartcenter than the 
one that runs on the gateways.
> thoughts please and any issues that we could encounter
>


Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================


=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================

Reply via email to