Thank you guys for your recommendations, I will rebuild the
configuration manually from the files objects_5_0.C, rulebases_5_0.fws
and fwauth.NDB
The hard disk can't be read even replacing the scsi controller card,
now I have the files from the gateway and started the config already.
Lot of work but we had to learn to backup daily in the hard way =[

Regards,

--Ivan.

2011/10/4, FW-1-MAILINGLIST automatic digest system
<[email protected]>:
> There are 12 messages totaling 1056 lines in this issue.
>
> Topics of the day:
>
>   1. How to upgrade from R70 to R75.20 (2)
>   2. Your opinions about R75/R75.20 (7)
>   3. Odd http requests after upgrade to R75.20
>   4. Question about restoring smartcenter (2)
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:31:51 +0300
> From:    a bv <[email protected]>
> Subject: How to upgrade from R70 to R75.20
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to have your recommendations of steps for upgrading R70
> SPLAT standalone gateways to R75.20 Software blade licensed standalone
> gateways. As all we do i would like have healty problemless  good
> performing gateways at the end.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:05:16 +0300
> From:    a bv <[email protected]>
> Subject: Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like have your opinions about R75.20 or R75 . Was it worth to
> upgrade? Were there perfomance gains? Do you have problems on them?
>
>
> regards
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:51:27 +0100
> From:    Eamonn Twohig <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Odd http requests after upgrade to R75.20
>
> Thanks Pierre and Alexey. We stepped back to R75 first, no joy, so we went
> back to R71.40, all is working good again now. I've left our Support Case
> open with Check Point.
>
> I also came across mails from June of this year, from this list, that
> highlighted problems with R75 and R75.20 in relation to http/https requests
> -
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg27375.html.
> Known issue for 4 months ... wish I found that BEFORE I went ahead with the
> upgrade!
>
> Regards,
> eamonn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre Lamy [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 01 October 2011 04:13
> To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
> Cc: Eamonn Twohig
> Subject: Re: [FW-1] Odd http requests after upgrade to R75.20
>
> I opened a Task for this today. It's a known issue, documented
> (somewhat) as a limitation of R75.20
>
> It also kills access to Voyager in IPSO.
>
> -Pierre
>
> On 9/30/2011 1:27 PM, Eamonn Twohig wrote:
>> The actual IP, no. We have a /27 available, so say the gw is at 1.2.3.4,
>> well the web server is NAT'ed behind 1.2.3.5, ftp is behind 1.2.3.6,
>> smtp is behind 1.2.3.7, dns is behind 1.2.3.8, etc.
>>
>> For a test, we tried NAT'ing the web server behind 1.2.3.9, and we went
>> with auto-NAT this time as we usually manually NAT items, but we got
>> exactly the same results. Consistency!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> eamonn
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gary
>> Scott
>> Sent: 30 September 2011 16:55
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [FW-1] Odd http requests after upgrade to R75.20
>>
>> Are you using the FW's external IP for service NAT?
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Eamonn Twohig<[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 7:03 PM
>> Subject: [FW-1] Odd http requests after upgrade to R75.20
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We've a bit of an oddity here after upgrading our firewalls to R75.20
>> from R65 HFA70. Management Server was done about 10 days ago whilst
>> gateways were done in the last two days.
>>
>> Since the upgrade of one of the gateways yesterday, everything seemed to
>> be working as previous until we discovered that no-one could access our
>> website anymore. A quick investigation, using tcpdump and fw monitor,
>> revealed that the firewall was dropping all https requests when hitting
>> the external IP of the web server. Which is the weird thing, because
>> no-one is sending https requests, only http. It seems that the firewall
>> is somehow converting http requests to https and then obviously dropping
>> them as our rulebase will only allow http. There are no problems
>> accepting and forwarding smtp traffic; there are no problems for anyone
>> doing udp lookups against our dns server; no problems for anyone hitting
>> our ftp server. Only the web server is causing us grief.
>>
>>
>> We've opened a support case with Check Point but so far, they are
>> stumped. This mailing list has some experienced people as members
>> though, so thought I'd ask ye too. Has anyone seen something like this
>> before?
>>
>> If all resources on the DMZ were inaccessible then that would make more
>> sense, or at least make it easier to troubleshoot, but this specific
>> issue with inbound http requests getting dropped as https is a little
>> odd.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eamonn
>>
>> --------------------------
>> Sent from my BlackBerry Device
>>
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message contains information
>> that is privileged or confidential, is the property of QC Data, and is
>> intended only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or use of this information is prohibited. If you have
>> received this message in error, please delete the original message and
>> any copy of it in your possession and notify us by telephone or email
>> immediately.
>>
>> QC Data (Ireland) Limited
>>
>> Registered in Ireland, Number: 158091
>> VAT Registration No.: IE 6556091K
>>
>> Registered office: 70 Sir John Rogersons Quay, Dublin 2, Republic of
>> Ireland.
>>
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message contains information that
>> is privileged or confidential, is the property of QC Data, and is intended
>> only for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, you are hereby notified that disclosure, copying, distribution
>> or use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this
>> message in error, please delete the original message and any copy of it in
>> your possession and notify us by telephone or email immediately.
>>
>> QC Data (Ireland) Limited
>>
>> Registered in Ireland, Number: 158091
>> VAT Registration No.: IE 6556091K
>>
>> Registered office: 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, Republic of
>> Ireland.
>>
>> IƧ��[�(^rC�{S�֥I�.�+r �^��
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message contains information that is
> privileged or confidential, is the property of QC Data, and is intended only
> for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this message in
> error, please delete the original message and any copy of it in your
> possession and notify us by telephone or email immediately.
>
> QC Data (Ireland) Limited
>
> Registered in Ireland, Number: 158091
> VAT Registration No.: IE 6556091K
>
> Registered office: 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, Republic of
> Ireland.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:35:51 +0100
> From:    Hugo van der Kooij <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Question about restoring smartcenter
>
>  On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:20:34 -0500, Ivan Arteaga
>  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Recently we lost our smartcenter server due to a hard disk crash..
>> our last backup is 3 months old and it is different than the current
>> configuration, lot of changes in policies and network objects (I know
>> we should backup more often =[ ) but my question is.... We already
>> have the files from the gateway and get the policies in script form
>> but is there any way to restore the smartcenter policies from the
>> gateway configuration or script files? otherwise I will have to
>> rewrite the policies one by one in the smart dashboard.
>
>  Ivan,
>
>  Use the backup and retype all changes of the last 3 months.
>
>  The format used to send information to the gateway is not realy usable.
>
>  Hugo.
>
> --
>  [email protected]   http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
>  PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:40:15 +0100
> From:    Hugo van der Kooij <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>
>  On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:05:16 +0300, a bv <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like have your opinions about R75.20 or R75 . Was it worth to
>> upgrade? Were there perfomance gains? Do you have problems on them?
>
>  Read the release notes about the changes. The feature list has been
>  changed quite a bit.
>
>  When you just upgrade it and add no new features the impact is
>  identical. But if you enable SSL intercept. Then you may see some
>  serious CPU usage.
>
>  Hugo.
>
> --
>  [email protected]   http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
>  PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:43:50 +0100
> From:    Hugo van der Kooij <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: How to upgrade from R70 to R75.20
>
>  On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 10:31:51 +0300, a bv <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I would like to have your recommendations of steps for upgrading R70
>> SPLAT standalone gateways to R75.20 Software blade licensed
>> standalone
>> gateways. As all we do i would like have healty problemless  good
>> performing gateways at the end.
>
>  Read the upgrade documentation.
>
>  Export config for backup puposes. Install upgrade tools. Export another
>  config with those tools. Cleanly install R75.20 and import the config.
>
>  pre upgrade verifiers are your friends.
>
>  However I seem to note a bit of a Must Consule Somebody Else sort of
>  questions.
>
>  Hugo.
>
> --
>  [email protected]   http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
>  PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:42:08 +0200
> From:    Reinhard Stich <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>
> At 09:05 03.10.2011, you wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I would like have your opinions about R75.20 or R75 . Was it worth to
>>upgrade? Were there perfomance gains? Do you have problems on them?
>
> I use R75.20, it's stable and I like the new app-control features ...
> performance is the same as it was with R75.
>
> br
> reinhard
>
> --
> Reinhard Stich                              [email protected]
> Arrow ECS Internet Security AG, 1100 Wien, Wienerbergstrasse 11
> Tel: +43 1 3709440       RS784-RIPE      Fax: +43 1 3709440-333
>
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:10:35 +0300
> From:    a bv <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>
> Many thanks for the answer? what about the perfomance issue comparing
> with R70 on same hardware? They wrote some code again as i guess to
> gain more performance while the blades are getting added and the
> firewall becomes more complex.
>
> 2011/10/3 Reinhard Stich <[email protected]>:
>> At 09:05 03.10.2011, you wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like have your opinions about R75.20 or R75 . Was it worth to
>>> upgrade? Were there perfomance gains? Do you have problems on them?
>>
>> I use R75.20, it's stable and I like the new app-control features ...
>> performance is the same as it was with R75.
>>
>> br
>> reinhard
>>
>> --
>> Reinhard Stich                              [email protected]
>> Arrow ECS Internet Security AG, 1100 Wien, Wienerbergstrasse 11
>> Tel: +43 1 3709440       RS784-RIPE      Fax: +43 1 3709440-333
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:29:38 -0700
> From:    Charles-Etienne Prévost <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>
> Hi,
>
> Based on about 8-10 upgrades we have done so far I have not seen any
> significant performance improvement for similar feature sets.  I would
> definitely recommend going directly to R75.20 if possible.. we encountered a
> few issues with R75, which appear to be fixed ( mostly ) with R75.20.
> However, most of the environments were on open servers, so my opinion might
> be a little biased.
>
> Cheers,
> Charles
>
> Charles-Etienne Prévost
> Analyste en sécurité de l'information
> Information Security Analyst
> GoSecure Inc.
>
> Experts en sécurité de l'information
> The Trusted Experts in Information Security
> http://www.gosecure.ca
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of a bv
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 7:11 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [FW-1] Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>
> Many thanks for the answer? what about the perfomance issue comparing
> with R70 on same hardware? They wrote some code again as i guess to
> gain more performance while the blades are getting added and the
> firewall becomes more complex.
>
> 2011/10/3 Reinhard Stich <[email protected]>:
>> At 09:05 03.10.2011, you wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like have your opinions about R75.20 or R75 . Was it worth to
>>> upgrade? Were there perfomance gains? Do you have problems on them?
>>
>> I use R75.20, it's stable and I like the new app-control features ...
>> performance is the same as it was with R75.
>>
>> br
>> reinhard
>>
>> --
>> Reinhard Stich                              [email protected]
>> Arrow ECS Internet Security AG, 1100 Wien, Wienerbergstrasse 11
>> Tel: +43 1 3709440       RS784-RIPE      Fax: +43 1 3709440-333
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:41:22 -0700
> From:    Charles-Etienne Prévost <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Question about restoring smartcenter
>
> Ivan,
>
> Depending on the amount of effort required to replay all changes, it might
> be worth it to get these files recovered from the dead HD..  How dead is it
> ? ( weird question I know ! )  Did you try to mount it on another machine
> yet?
>
> If you can recover these 3 files only (objects_5_0.C, rulebases_5_0.fws and
> fwauth.NDB ), you can rebuild most of your Smart Center.  It is a lengthy
> process too but could still be your best pick ..
>
> Charles
>
> Charles-Etienne Prévost
> Analyste en sécurité de l'information
> Information Security Analyst
> GoSecure Inc.
>
> Experts en sécurité de l'information
> The Trusted Experts in Information Security
> http://www.gosecure.ca
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hugo van
> der Kooij
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 5:36 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [FW-1] Question about restoring smartcenter
>
>  On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:20:34 -0500, Ivan Arteaga
>  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Recently we lost our smartcenter server due to a hard disk crash..
>> our last backup is 3 months old and it is different than the current
>> configuration, lot of changes in policies and network objects (I know
>> we should backup more often =[ ) but my question is.... We already
>> have the files from the gateway and get the policies in script form
>> but is there any way to restore the smartcenter policies from the
>> gateway configuration or script files? otherwise I will have to
>> rewrite the policies one by one in the smart dashboard.
>
>  Ivan,
>
>  Use the backup and retype all changes of the last 3 months.
>
>  The format used to send information to the gateway is not realy usable.
>
>  Hugo.
>
> --
>  [email protected]   http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
>  PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:34:13 -0600
> From:    Sergio Alvarez <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>
> In some of our customers' deployments with UTM-1 appliances, I noticed a
> performance improvement going from R70 to R75 (and even R71). In deployments
> with open servers instead of Check Point appliances, the difference was not
> so noticeable.
> What did improve, no matter the hardware platform, was the time it takes to
> open the SmartDashboard and install the policy.
>
> Regards
>
> 2011/10/3 Charles-Etienne Prévost <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Based on about 8-10 upgrades we have done so far I have not seen any
>> significant performance improvement for similar feature sets.  I would
>> definitely recommend going directly to R75.20 if possible.. we encountered
>> a
>> few issues with R75, which appear to be fixed ( mostly ) with R75.20.
>>  However, most of the environments were on open servers, so my opinion
>> might
>> be a little biased.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Charles
>>
>> Charles-Etienne Prévost
>> Analyste en sécurité de l'information
>> Information Security Analyst
>> GoSecure Inc.
>>
>> Experts en sécurité de l'information
>> The Trusted Experts in Information Security
>> http://www.gosecure.ca
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of a bv
>> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 7:11 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [FW-1] Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>>
>> Many thanks for the answer? what about the perfomance issue comparing
>> with R70 on same hardware? They wrote some code again as i guess to
>> gain more performance while the blades are getting added and the
>> firewall becomes more complex.
>>
>> 2011/10/3 Reinhard Stich <[email protected]>:
>> > At 09:05 03.10.2011, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I would like have your opinions about R75.20 or R75 . Was it worth to
>> >> upgrade? Were there perfomance gains? Do you have problems on them?
>> >
>> > I use R75.20, it's stable and I like the new app-control features ...
>> > performance is the same as it was with R75.
>> >
>> > br
>> > reinhard
>> >
>> > --
>> > Reinhard Stich                              [email protected]
>> > Arrow ECS Internet Security AG, 1100 Wien, Wienerbergstrasse 11
>> > Tel: +43 1 3709440       RS784-RIPE      Fax: +43 1 3709440-333
>> >
>> > Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>> >
>> > =================================================
>> > To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> > send an email to [email protected]
>> > in the BODY of the email add:
>> > set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> > =================================================
>> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> > please see the instructions at
>> > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> > =================================================
>> > If you have any questions on how to change your
>> > subscription options, email
>> > [email protected]
>> > =================================================
>> >
>> > Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>> >
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Alvarez
> CISSP | CCSE+
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date:    Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:34:13 -0600
> From:    Sergio Alvarez <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>
> In some of our customers' deployments with UTM-1 appliances, I noticed a
> performance improvement going from R70 to R75 (and even R71). In deployments
> with open servers instead of Check Point appliances, the difference was not
> so noticeable.
> What did improve, no matter the hardware platform, was the time it takes to
> open the SmartDashboard and install the policy.
>
> Regards
>
> 2011/10/3 Charles-Etienne Prévost <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Based on about 8-10 upgrades we have done so far I have not seen any
>> significant performance improvement for similar feature sets.  I would
>> definitely recommend going directly to R75.20 if possible.. we encountered
>> a
>> few issues with R75, which appear to be fixed ( mostly ) with R75.20.
>>  However, most of the environments were on open servers, so my opinion
>> might
>> be a little biased.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Charles
>>
>> Charles-Etienne Prévost
>> Analyste en sécurité de l'information
>> Information Security Analyst
>> GoSecure Inc.
>>
>> Experts en sécurité de l'information
>> The Trusted Experts in Information Security
>> http://www.gosecure.ca
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of a bv
>> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 7:11 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [FW-1] Your opinions about R75/R75.20
>>
>> Many thanks for the answer? what about the perfomance issue comparing
>> with R70 on same hardware? They wrote some code again as i guess to
>> gain more performance while the blades are getting added and the
>> firewall becomes more complex.
>>
>> 2011/10/3 Reinhard Stich <[email protected]>:
>> > At 09:05 03.10.2011, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I would like have your opinions about R75.20 or R75 . Was it worth to
>> >> upgrade? Were there perfomance gains? Do you have problems on them?
>> >
>> > I use R75.20, it's stable and I like the new app-control features ...
>> > performance is the same as it was with R75.
>> >
>> > br
>> > reinhard
>> >
>> > --
>> > Reinhard Stich                              [email protected]
>> > Arrow ECS Internet Security AG, 1100 Wien, Wienerbergstrasse 11
>> > Tel: +43 1 3709440       RS784-RIPE      Fax: +43 1 3709440-333
>> >
>> > Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>> >
>> > =================================================
>> > To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> > send an email to [email protected]
>> > in the BODY of the email add:
>> > set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> > =================================================
>> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> > please see the instructions at
>> > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> > =================================================
>> > If you have any questions on how to change your
>> > subscription options, email
>> > [email protected]
>> > =================================================
>> >
>> > Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>> >
>>
>> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>> =================================================
>> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
>> send an email to [email protected]
>> in the BODY of the email add:
>> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
>> =================================================
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
>> please see the instructions at
>> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>> =================================================
>> If you have any questions on how to change your
>> subscription options, email
>> [email protected]
>> =================================================
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Alvarez
> CISSP | CCSE+
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of FW-1-MAILINGLIST Digest - 2 Oct 2011 to 3 Oct 2011 (#2011-124)
> *********************************************************************
>
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
>

Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

=================================================
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================

Reply via email to