> From: Jean-Pierre Harvey
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Over a period of time I have seen several posts claiming that NAT is
better set up
> manually in FW-1 rather than using the auto NAT features. I also have not
seen anyone
> defend the auto NATing. So why is manual NAT so much better? Or, why is
the automatic
> NATing not as good?
Manual NAT is better, because you can change the order of NAT
rules; so much more flexible than automatic NAT. In complex
environment this is a very important thing... With automatic
NAT, you can't make any changes in the questionable rules,
can't add services, destinations, etc. etc.
Regards,
Tibor
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
