RIP would not be able to be used since the RIP protocol would advertise the actual interfaces as their gateway addresses instead of the VRRP virtual IP address. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Larry Pingree Sr. Security Consultant Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SiegeWorks Company WebSite: http://www.siegeworks.com/ Security Installation, Training and Consulting -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ----- Original Message ----- From: Raymond N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:29 AM Subject: [FW1] Nokia VRRP and RIP v2 > > Hi there, > > Would someone tell me what would happen when two Nokia boxes setup with > VRRPmc on both inside and outside interface, and have RIP v2 enable? Right > now, my internal router has a static route point to the VRRP VIP. But we > want to start using dynamic routing protocol becuase we would have multiple > subnets built in the inside network, each would have a cisco router to > route traffic between inside subnets as well as to the Nokia (Internet > connection). So, I want to use RIP v2 instead of keep adding static routes. > > Thanks. > > > > > > ============================================================================ ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ ==== > > ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
