Don is a sharp cookie.

Looks like the issue has been covered very well.  The only thing I have
to add is that O'Reilly's DNS and Bind should be required reading before
touching DNS.  If you admin a firewall and do not have this book, shame
on you.  Redeem yourself and go read it now :-).

(This will probably get wrapped. Sorry.)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596001584/qid=1020437027/sr=1-1/
ref=sr_1_1/102-8517624-7830520


-s

-----Original Message-----
From: Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FW-1] DNS Question


> We allow DNS over UDP only and have not had any problems.
Since this only affects large queries, you would probably not notice the
failures. It is, however, wrong.

> Don, can you give us a reference/RFC for these large DNS requests over

> TCP?
RFC 1035.

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1035.html

Section 4.2

> I find nothing
> about it, it is my understanding that only zone transfers use TCP.
This is a very common misconception. UDP is the standard transport, but
not the required one. You could perform every request with a TCP
connection, however a TCP connection is usually only used after a UDP
connection has failed to fit within the 512 byte window resulting in the
TC bit being set in the header.

-Don

=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================

Reply via email to