Alex,

        On policy you have to use @A->@B:Accept by nat at @A. For
routing, you should route C->A. I used to heard that on NG there's no
need for manual routing anymore but I never used NG. What version do you
use?

Phun

-----Original Message-----
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:FW-1-MAILINGLIST@;beethoven.us.checkpoint.com] On Behalf Of Alex
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 11:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW-1] Firewalling, natting & routing

Hello,

I would like to know which way Firewalling,  natting &  routing occurs

For exemple, if you have:
>session between Ip adresse @A and @B
>nat translation like @A translate to @C,

What will happens in the firewall?
What rule do we need to write:
@A->@B:Accept  or @C->@B:Accept

Which route do we need to give on the firewall?
Route towards @A or @C

Thanks for any advice

=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================

=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================

Reply via email to