Hi,
I think there are a lot of differences:
Pix is pretty fast (should make 100Mbit/s without any problems) but quiet stupid. We
use pix as Paket Filter
instead of a screening router. You cannot do any sensful Client authentication,
loadbalancing on http Servers
or filter SMTP traffic with the pix. Maximum of interfaces is 6 Fast Ethernet. I think
pix is good for doing
simple Paket-Filtering.
Timo
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2000 10:48
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [FW1] Comparing Cisco Pix and Nokia
Has someone a comparison study between Cisco Pix and Nokia, since I have to
provide an h/w firewall solution, the initial choice is towards Cisco 520 (and
do not know the corresponding Nokia one).
Some of the doubts I have:
Do both offer the enterprise solution==> One management from which i run more
firewall module
Opsec fetures supported by both
Sinthetic difference table
Major issues and pros of each.
Thanks in advace to every contribution to it.
Piero
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
