All,
I have a question regarding the architecture of a protected DMZ.
We have a firewall with three interfaces, one to the Internet, one to the 
internal network, and one to the DMZ. A router sits in front of each 
interface. The DMZ router has been failing the last several weeks. It has 
been suggested to not replace this router and grow the DMZ at firewall. Our 
growing DMZ is on an un-segmented, un-switched class c with about 120 nodes. 
The fw1 v4.0 firewall runs on a Sparc E2 2 processors and 768mb of memory. 
It supports a large enterprise network.
In your opinion, what are some of the pros and cons of having the DMZ router 
in place or doing away with it all together?
Thanks for your input.
Curt

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to