If your IP addresses are routable, why do you want to do NAT? If they aren't,
you really only need to do static nat on machines that need to be reached by
the outside world, such as mail or web servers. Everything else could be done
with hide mode NAT.
Dan Lundien, CCNA, CCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
AppNet, Inc
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 31 12:12 EDT 2000
> From: "Sam, Garson (CA - Vancouver)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [FW1] FW1: Q re: Mapping of routable IPs
> Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 11:29:48 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>
>
> I hope that I could run this by before I implement it.
>
> Basically there is a T1 feed (with 200 ips) that I would like to assign to
> 200 workstations. All the workstation IPs are to be protected by a FW1 4.0.
> What is the best way to do this? Would I static NAT each address
> individually? Or would I be able to static NAT a range. I was just
> concerned with setting one computer to 209.x.x.12 in the TCPIP properties,
> but having the firewall map it to 209.x.x.14. (Or does FW1 do the
> assignment sequentially).
>
> OR, is there a better way of doing this?
>
> right now there is
>
> T1 ==> FW1 Box ===> Switch
>
> Thanks
>
> Garson
>
>
> ================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
>
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
