On Mon, 5 Jun 2000 14:41:40 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>It appears to me that there's a bug in FW-1, since it allows the
sender to
>be <>....
>
>Anyone?
Dave,
RFC 821 states:
=One way to prevent loops in error reporting is to specify a null
=reverse-path in the MAIL command of a notification message. When such
=a message is relayed it is permissible to leave the reverse-path
=null. A MAIL command with a null reverse-path appears as follows:
= MAIL FROM:<>
So this form is absolutely legal and your Firewall should let it pass.
>
>Dave Grabowski
>System Arts, Inc.
>(212) 604-9015 x316
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
// pallas GmbH ............ Joerg Oertel ...........
Hermuelheimer Str. 10 System engineer
D-50321 Bruehl, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone +49-(0)2232-1896-0
http://www.pallas.de fax +49-(0)2232-1896-29
........................................................
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
