For some reason those two words Microsoft and Firewalls just dont invoke
warm feelings of happiness.
Maybe its the incredibly insecure products they create.... showcode.asp :=)
Sure Checkpoint Support is known for its lackluster response. But pound for
pound FW-1 is a great product.
But if a low cost Firewall that actually works is what your after...
Try www.openbsd.org <http://www.openbsd.org>  Ive known several companies
that are deploying firewalls based on that OS.
Its free, its fast, it works and best of all its favorite color is not
blue... <grin>
 
Just my $.02 cents,
 
Fabian J. Oliva
CCSE CCNA N+ MCSE
"These opinions are my own, and not those of my employer, client, boss,
their sisters brother's roommates friend, or anyone named Steve"

-----Original Message-----
From: Newman, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW1] Microsoft Firewalls


I don't know if anyone else caught it...
 
http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20000606S0003
<http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20000606S0003> 
 
Nice little article on Microsoft unveiling Internet Security and
Acceleration (ISA) Server 2000, 
which provides multilevel firewall protection and Web.  
 
The article provides more detail of course.  The one thing that excited me
about it is that I'm a 
firm believer in competition.  The more, the better.  Microsoft's product
will have Stateful Inspection, as well.
 
Now, hopefully Microsoft won't follow Checkpoint's lead in customer
support... or lack there of, sometimes.  I've been
trying for about four weeks now to get a copy of the CP2000 disc with a
thirty day demo license.  We're a partner and
I'm certified.  You'd think they'd want to fire a copy right out... <grin>
 
Such a deal.  
 
 
Steven Newman
Norstan Consulting
MCSE/CCSE



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to