Unfortunately, Checkpoint doesn't really care. I've had this conversation
with various mid-level people at CP and they all spout the same nonsense
about protecting their intellectual property, ad nauseam...
They're right - dead right. They just don't understand that they are
rapidly losing market share as a result, and whether they are right or not
- they lose. I'd dump the stock.
Brian
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Support line issues and Licensing problems increase admin overhead by
100%
I'm a CP shareholder and I want CP to make as much profit as
possible, nevertheless I don't understand their licensing policy.
The bad girls won't pay under no circumstances cause there are
technical workarounds public available, making a legal purchased
license dispensable. On the other hand the good girls - like most of
us on this list - will pay for the product independently if it works
without a license or not.
As a CP shareholder I'd like to reduce licensing overhead
drastically. Furthermore it does not seem to be a good idea to
disgruntle the good girls with the annoying license procedures,
pushing them into the arms of other firewall vendors (at least
as long as I don't have bought their shares ;-)
Olaf
--
Olaf Selke, [EMAIL PROTECTED], voice +49 5241 80-7069
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
