sort of:
internet
class c/24
router
class c/24
firewall
class c/24
firewall
class c/24
firewall
class c/24
router
class c/24
intranet
rf
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rick Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: [FW1] multi layer defence strategy
> I'm not sure I follow - is this what you're saying?
>
> outside
> -------
> router
> ------
> 192.168.1.0/24
> ------
> router
> ------
> 192.168.2.0/24
> ----- and so forth?
>
> well, you could get high latency going from one side of it to the
> other. Especially if these are firewalls, depending on policy and machine
> speed and amount of traffic &c.
>
> --
> Jack Coates, Rainfinity SE
> t: 650-962-5301 m: 650-280-4376
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Rick Francis wrote:
>
> >
> > what are the (dis)advantages of assigning different class-c network
> > addresses on each side of four layered routers, whose interiors' support
> > things like dmz servers, web servers, applications servers, database
> > servers? (aside from the waste of numbers.)
> >
> > doesn't it improve performance/speed? better/more difficult security
> > paradigm? thoughts//
> >
> > rf
> >
> >
> >
> >
============================================================================
====
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
at
> > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
============================================================================
====
> >
>
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
