Hi,
Does this mean 4.0 SP5 cannot be used to build the IPSec tunnel?
Thanks.
J
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert MacDonald
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 6:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FW1] IPSEC with Cisco Routers
Jeremy,
Cisco is correct, you'll need FW1 v4.1, since FW1v4.0
cannot failover those connections. As for Cisco<->CP,
take a look at:
http://www.imtek.com/IPSec.html
This is a step by step on manual IPSEC between a Cisco
and FW-1.
Robert
- -
Robert P. MacDonald, Network Engineer
e-Business Infrastructure
G o r d o n F o o d S e r v i c e
Voice: +1.616.261.7987 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Jeremy Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/17/00 8:07:23 PM >>>
>
>I am trying to establish a IPSEC tunnel from my 4.0 firewall to a cisco
>router. Now Cisco have told me that I will need FW1 ver 4.1 for
>successful communication with the router .. has anyone found this to be
>true/false?
>
>Also, we have 2 firewalls in a failover setup. Has anyone tried to
>establish a tunnel with failover from 2 firewalls to one router? Anyone
>have any nifty ideas on how to do this? The best I've been able to come
>up with would be to have both firewalls operating with the same key, and
>have the route at the other end changed manually in case of the primary
>firewall failing. Does anyone have an opinion on the feasibility or
>security of such an option? Or an alternative?
>Thanks
>Jeremy
============================================================================
====
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
