Ivan,
Although many members of this list have pointed out that this is NOT
possible, there are spaces for you to input that information in the NAT tab
of the firewall policy (under "port" or "service", I can't remember...). I
suggest you play with it - I'd be interested to know if it does indeed work.
Jason
At 08:29 PM 7/21/00 -0400, Ivan Fox wrote:
> Can I use NAT effectively to translate services "ports", not IP
>address? Customer A needs to access http-server-a (222.222.222.111),
>Customer B needs to access http-server-b (222.222.222.222). Provided
>FW-1 can do it, I am going to tell all customers to use a single (same) IP
>address, e.g., 11.11.11.11 with different port number, to access their
>respective servers (222.222.222.111 or 222.222.222.222), such as
>https://11.11.11.11:3333 to http-server-A, https://11.11.11.11:3334 to
>http-server-B? Any comments are appreciated. Regards, Ivan
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
