What about Microsoft's version of RPC - does it have a list of program
numbers similar to how Unix assigns program number? If we want to allow the
Microsoft Management Console to manage a web server in the DMZ, is there a
way to do it by assigning an RPC object to it instead of allowing TCP and
UDP services?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Guo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 12:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [FW1] RPC
>
>
>
> Dear Gurus,
>
> There once a list of port numbers circulating in the list, and it's so
> useful. Is there any similar things for RPC program numbers?
> Can somebody
> provide some information on RPC program numbers and related TCP/IP
> behaviors?
>
> Thnaks
>
> Simon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Tan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 11:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [FW1] Different BLOCK of IPsegment given.
>
>
>
> I have a situation below :
>
> The firewall module and management module was given only one
> IP address
> 155.21.86.106 (vaild IP address) subnetmask 255.255.255.128, gateway
> 155.21.86.1 (it is registered IP for the license part), the other LAN
> segment is 155.21.84.208/29 (vaild IP address)
>
> There are 3 network cards on this firewall NT server, which
> consist of
> Internal,External,DMZ.
>
> The internal will have
> IP address 192.168.2.x,
> External will have 155.21.84.x and
> DMZ will have 192.168.1.x
>
> So I want the firewall to translate internal IP which is
> 192.168.1.x to
> external 155.21.84.x. (NOT 155.21.86.106)
>
> So in order to make this work, first I configure external
> network card to
> have IP address 155.21.86.106 and subnet mask 255.255.255.128
> and gateway
> 155.21.86.1. Correct or the other way round? DO I NEED TO ADD
> 155.21.84.x
> in the Advance option under TCPIP in the same network card?
> If yes, is it just by doing the normal NAT procedure will do?
> Eg, configure
> static NAT on the policy, add information on the local.arp and add a
> statics route like "route add 155.21.84.1 192.168.1.10"
>
> When the firewall do the NAT, must NAT translate only the
> same block of
> external IP address which the firewall is registered? Eg, if
> to do NAT, the
> NAT translation of external address must be 155.21.86.x since
> the firewall
> ip is 155.21.86.106? True? Can it do 155.21.84.x instead?
>
> Please advise. Thanks.
> Best Regards,
> Peter Tan
> Certified Lotus Professional (CLP)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> alterative email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ==============================================================
> ==============
> ====
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the
> instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ==============================================================
> ==============
> ====
>
>
> ==============================================================
> ==================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the
> instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ==============================================================
> ==================
>
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
