Scott,
I am running the same version of IPSO and once I had a situation similar
to yours.
I have about 12 static routes configured on the box. 
Once it happened to me that one was lost. 
As it only happened to me once I didn't payed too much attention.
One lesson I learned from then was to look very carefully at the static
routing table after a new static route is added and afterwards saved in
Voyager.

Have you static routes disspeared after the routing table was changed
somehow in Nokia
(add or remove a route)?

Cristian




"McMeekin, Scott" wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am unable to reproduce this problem, but it's happened twice now and it's
> causing real concern. Has anyone else who is running Nokia firewalls ever
> experienced an inexplicable loss of a variable number of static routes? I'm
> using F-secure ssh v1.0 and Netscape Navigator to securely forward the http
> Voyager interface to an IP440 running IPSO 3.2.1.
> 
> What happened was at some point in the last couple of days I've been using
> the voyager interface to look at a few things (no changes were made). Today
> I get a call to say some connectivity has been lost, and on checking various
> routing tables in other routers, certain routes appeared to have vanished. I
> checked the firewall and Lo and Behold, 15 static routes (which get
> redistributed internally) had vanished! After the initial scratching of
> heads, I restored the IPSO backup and all was well, however this a serious
> enough occurance to merit immediate and thorough investigation.
> 
> Anyone experienced this before I go wading into the support channels?
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Scott.
> 
> The Royal Bank of Scotland plc is registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered 
>Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB.
> 
> The Royal Bank of Scotland plc is regulated by IMRO, SFA and Personal Investment 
>Authority.
> 
> This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only.  If the 
>message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return the message to 
>the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer.
> 
> 'Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does 
>not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent.'
> 
> ================================================================================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to