Is your VPN primarily SecuRemote users, nailed-up FW-2-FW tunnels, or a
combination of both? How many of each?
Mark L. Decker
Rainfinity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(408) 382-4870
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Thomas Nau
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 10:29 PM
To: Cedric Amand
Cc: Thomas Nau; FW-1 mailing list
Subject: Re: [FW1] FW-1 plus load-balancing
Hmm, 30 rules are a good guess but 20+ are tooo many. The goal would be in
the 2-4 range. I'll have to look in products like SUN's screen which is
supposed to support multi-CPU nodes but doesn't offer load balancing
between boxes as far as I know.
Thomas
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Cedric Amand wrote:
|Hello Thomas,
|
|TN> 2. which products would you recommend from the performance and
|TN> scalability point of viev? VPN is bo real issue so mainly packet
|TN> filtering inf the 400-1000Mbit range must be offered.
|
|then, in real life, you're heading at 20+ firewalls in parallel
|for a medium (30 rules) ruleset.
|
|My 2 cent.
|
|
|
====== PGP fingerprint B1 EE D2 39 2C 82 26 DA A5 4D E0 50 35 75 9E ED
======
Thought you got rid of all year 2k bugs and problems?
Here's a new one: Windows 2000
============================================================================
====
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
