Yes, it will cause a problem, because you will have invalid sa negotiation for
duplicated networks. If you implement as you have indicated, your vpn will cease to
work...
Jack norb wrote:
> Currently we have a VPN connection that is working fine. The remote network
> uses 10.1.15.0/24 and the central site uses a 10.1.16.0/24.
>
> The remote site needs access to the whole central network. The central
> network is massive and I do not want to add all the objects.
>
> Can I define an encryption domain, 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0, on the central
> side? Will this cause any problems with encrypting/decrypting of packets.
>
> Thanks.
> Jack Norb,
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
> ================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
