Johan,
Seems like you've used reserved word(s) by CP
or the objects.C file has some corruption.
What is the name of the object(s)?
Robert
- -
Robert P. MacDonald, Network Engineer
Team Lead, e-Business Infrastructure
G o r d o n F o o d S e r v i c e
Voice: +1.616.261.7987 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Johan Lindstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/24/00 11:01:55 AM >>>
>
>Hi!
>
>I found this list yesterday when trying to find information about a problem
>we have. If this isn't the correct forum, please enlighten me :)
>
>Anyway, we recently performed a new install of FW1 4.1
>(patchlevel/upgrade/whatever 2). During testing the weirdest things
>happened. Traffic that should be matched by a rule simply didn't match and
>would then bump into the last rule (drop and alert) instead.
>
>We tried to isolate the problem and after a few tests the problem seemed to
>be a particular Network Object, a workstation in the Source-field of the
>rule. We could not find anything wrong with the workstation object (apart
>from the fact that it didn't actually work).
>
>So we created an _identical_ object only with a different name. With that
>object in place of the broken one the rule worked fine, matching the
>traffic we expected. Further testing revealed a number of other objects
>that also seems to be broken.
>
>So my question is if this behaviour rings a bell. Does it look like
>anything you guys have experienced before?
>
>/J
>--
>Johan Lindstr�m, Sourcerer, Boss Casinos Ltd, Antigua
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
