Thats how all Regals users are setup and we don't have any complaints
Andrew Bagrin
Secure-1
865-803-2748
www.secure-1.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Guinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: [FW1] Securemote issue
>
> Good point...DHCP could make life much easier, but it could also make the
> machine complain that it can't get an IP when it's remote.
>
> Dan Guinn
> NetStar Communications
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Bagrin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 1:39 PM
> To: Kimberly Newton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [FW1] Securemote issue
>
>
>
> Why don't you put them on DHCP in the office?
> Andrew Bagrin
> Secure-1
> 865-803-2748
> www.secure-1.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kimberly Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 5:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [FW1] Securemote issue
>
>
> >
> > I have a question regarding this, also. I went ahead and took the IP
> address
> > off and it worked wonderfully. Thank you very much, Dan. However, now
what
> > do we do when the people are back in the office and need to be on the
> > network with an IP address? Is there a way to make this work without
> having
> > to have the user delete their IP address when on the road and then plug
> the
> > info back in when they get back to the office?
> >
> > >From: "Dan Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: "Robert MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: Re: [FW1] Securemote issue
> > >Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 20:02:01 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > >are these workstations that are used in the office as well as remote
use?
> > >if you are sure that the encryption domain has been verified correctly,
> > >make
> > >sure that the workstation doesn't have an address, of the network you
are
> > >trying to attach to, assigned to the nic. if so release it unless it is
> > >win2000 workstation
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Robert MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 8:11 AM
> > >Subject: Re: [FW1] Securemote issue
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Idan,
> > > >
> > > > Assuming(ack) that you have the excryption domain
> > > > defined properly, it sounds like you don't have
> > > > a rule to allow IKE or FWZ.
> > > >
> > > > Your firewall object should have either of these
> > > > checked. What does the remote clients' user.C
> > > > look like? Does it include the correct systems?
> > > >
> > > > By any chance, do you have a local NIC defined
> > > > on the client? If so, that also may be your problem.
> > > >
> > > > What rule was associated with the decrypt log entry?
> > > > Are you sure there wasn't any other log entries. Do
> > > > you have a sniffer available to you?
> > > >
> > > > Robert
> > > >
> > > > - -
> > > > Robert P. MacDonald, Network Engineer
> > > > Team Lead, e-Business Infrastructure
> > > > G o r d o n F o o d S e r v i c e
> > > > Voice: +1.616.261.7987 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > >>> Idan Dolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/19/00 11:15:14 AM >>>
> > > > >
> > > > >Hi guys,
> > > > >
> > > > >Has anybody encountered a problem with securemote where you get
> > > > >authenticated by the firewall but still no communication with the
> > >internal
> > > > >lan.
> > > > >
> > > > >I already checked the encryption domain, rewrote the rule,
> > >anti-spoofing
> > > > >checked, the user was checked, fwz and IKE had the same behavior.
> > > > >
> > > > >I could see in the event log a decrypt connection to my client be
> still
> > >no
> > > > >data shown on my client.
> > > > >
> > > > >The firewall is 4.1 sp2 on NT,
> > > > >
> > > > >Any comments before I break down and cry......
> > > > >
> > > > >Idan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
>===========================================================================
> =
> > >====
> > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the
> instructions
> > >at
> > > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> > > >
> >
>
>===========================================================================
> =
> > >====
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>===========================================================================
> =====
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the
instructions
> at
> > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
>
>===========================================================================
> =====
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> _________
> > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
> http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
============================================================================
> ====
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
at
> > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
>
============================================================================
> ====
>
>
>
>
============================================================================
> ====
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>
============================================================================
> ====
>
>
>
============================================================================
====
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
