Well, I just had a problem on NT installation that I have seen a couple times now.
I am running CP2000 SP2 at this site and what happens is that I install the policy
via the GUI client. It shows that it has complied it successfully and supposedly 
installed ok.

However, my old rule base is still in effect.

So I compile install several more times, to no avail.

I then bounce the FW-1 services on the enforcement server and VIOLA the new
rulebase is in effect.

Anyone else experience this too?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Quinonez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jack Klein'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: [FW1] NT or Unix


> 
> Flamebait! LOL Kidding of course... I would choose Solaris, if for nothing
> else because of IP forwarding.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Klein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 11:04 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [FW1] NT or Unix
> 
> 
> 
> We are in the midst of a controversy and would like to hear some opinions.
> Should we install a FW-1 on an NT or a Unix machine? Why?
> Thanks for all of your opinions.
> 
> 
> 
> ============================================================================
> ====
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ============================================================================
> ====
> 
> 
> ================================================================================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
> 



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to