You may be correct -- that's why I formed
that statement as an interrogative. I've
not tried it as yet and was unaware of the
timeout of the arp entries under NT vs. 2K.
I suppose there's only one way to find out.
;)
Chris
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 4:43 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [FW1] CP2000 on Win2k
>>
>>
>> Chris,
>> In that case the arp handling in NT->2000 must have changed. This was not
>> possible on NT 4 as arp -s was only handled internally and the internal
>> entry vanished after a few minutes. That's why checkpoint came
>> up with the
>> local.arp workaround for NT.
>>
>> Lars
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:01 AM
>> To: FW-1 Mailing List (E-Mail)
>> Subject: RE: [FW1] CP2000 on Win2k
>>
>>
>> What about just using 'arp -s aa-bb-cc-dd-ee-ff' in a startup
>> batch/script
>> on the Win2K box? Would this not accomplish the same thing?
>>
>> Many people do not have access to their access router (managed
>> by their upstream, for example.)
>>
>> Just another potential solution.
>>
>>
>> /chris
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
>> Of Brian C.
>> Kovatch
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 2:21 PM
>> To: Arno Hechenberger; 'Jon Vandiveer'; FW-1 Mailing List (E-Mail)
>> Subject: RE: [FW1] CP2000 on Win2k
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> SP3 Release Notes indicate that local.arp does not work on Win2K at this
>> point. Have to add static routes to the Internet router to point to the
>> Firewall for the next hop.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arno
>> Hechenberger
>> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 3:36 PM
>> To: 'Jon Vandiveer'; FW-1 Mailing List (E-Mail)
>> Subject: AW: [FW1] CP2000 on Win2k
>> Importance: High
>>
>>
>> HI !!!
>>
>> I've just installed FW-1 on Win2000. It works fine and about 20%
>> faster than
>> WinNT40 on the same hardware.
>>
>> ... but the FW-1 kernel is ignoring my local.arp for the static
>> and hide NAT
>> functions !!!!
>>
>> How to solve this problem ???
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Jon
>> Vandiveer
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. November 2000 18:37
>> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Betreff: [FW1] CP2000 on Win2k
>>
>>
>> It works, use the setup.exe
>>
>> there are some limitations though (local.arp) does not work and
>> you have to
>> turn on IP forwarding..... this is done with a reg hack to win2k
>>
>> CP will support you on this
>>
>> Jon
>>
smime.p7s
