Hi.

Can anybody please tell me if I am missing something basic here?

Here is a model of our network:


Internal network
                      Internet &
                      Default Gateway                    ---------
                      --------                         192.168.1.0/24
                          |                              ---------
                          |                                 |
                          |                                 |
                     192.x.x.x/24                           |
                          |                             192.168.1.1
10.0.0.0/16 ---10.0.0.1 - Firewall                          |
                          Checkpoint - 10.1.0.2  --------10.1.0.1 FreeBSD
                          V 4.0
                          |             --------
                        172.16.1.1      10.1.0.0/24 link to
                          |             --------    another site
                          |
                          |
                          |
                       ----------
                       172.16.1.0/24
                       ----------
                          DMZ

The firewall has 4 cards in.  The default gateway is the external card.  The 
DMZ zone and the internal network all work fine.  Recently we have installed 
another card to allow us to access the 193.168.1.0 network on through the 
interface 10.1.0.2.  On the firewall any machine or the gateway for the 192 
network can be accessed without a problem.

>From behind our firewall no machine can access this network.  Any packet by 
default gets sent to the default gateway and returns some unreachable 
address outside.. Am I right in assuming that this means that the packet is 
being passed to the default gateway for routing?

We thought that a static route was needed to access this network:
and the reverse on the FreeBSD.

something like:

route add 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.1

This allows routing from the Freesbsd to our network, but unfortunately not 
for us.

We have tried a number of other combinations with no luck.

We used netmon on the firewall to take some sample data and analysed the 
packets bound for the 192 network.  The short of it was no routing 
information present.

Is there a limitation of NT that I am missing here (or is it just limitation 
of my throbbing brain.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated and warmly welcomed.

Thanks.

Philip
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================

Reply via email to