Conrad,
At my previos job, we had a CacheFlow Appliance parrellel with the
firewall. The appliance was in transparent mode, and dual homed.
This device did everything the liturature and sales staff promised. The
support was exceptional.
The reporting features were good, and the administration was well
documented.
Overall I would put a Cacheflow box back in my network, if our policy
allowed "free" browsing. Currenly only select individuals are allow so the
justification is not there for me.
Thanks,
Phillip
---------------------------------------------------------
Phillilp Blatzheim
ATOFINA Petrochemicals, Inc.
Information Technology -- Telecom
15710 JFK Blvd.
Houston, TX 77032
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (281) 227-5545
Fax: (281) 227-5515
---------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Conrad Chircop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 8:21 AM
To: Firewall-1 Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject: [FW1] Using Cache appliances to seperate HTTP flow of content
from FW-1
We are considering to seperate HTTP content by using a cache server
solution in parallel to
FW-1 with a proprietary OS such as CacheFlow - thus we would be decreasing
the traffic through it.
Has anybody tried out a similar solution & if yes, what is your opinion of
it ?
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
Conrad Chircop
============================================================================
====
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
