[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I hate to say this, but... try thinking outside the box! Just because the
> bridge you bought ten years ago doesn't have the functionallity that I am
> suggesting doesn't mean that it shouldn't be done! Or tried atleast.
>
> I am not mistaking anything, I just think that it would be more secure if
> the firewall was transparent.
Checkout Sunscreen EFS3.x from Sun. It can work in router and stealth
modes. In stealth mode it is invisible. You just drop it into a subnet.
For me the EFS3.x is a much more secure firewall than fw-1 with most
of the features provided by fw-1. I admin both fw-1 and Sunscreens and
this is just my opinion. I'm in no way connected with Sun.
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
