Personally I think if your vendor is not capable of supporting or at least
informing you if a similar solution, hard or not, exist for your problem,
you should consider buying support from somebody else.
(Just a side-track remark)
Gijs
-----Original Message-----
From: Cedric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 6:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FW1] RADWARE FireProof and SecuRemote
Hello lchiavacci,
lboi> I would like to know if anyone has set up a SecuRemote connection with
a
lboi> FW1 whose external interface address gets NATTED by something before
(it
lboi> might be a router or a FireProof).
There is no easy way to solve that problem.
Two approaches
1) radware : You assign one particular IP adress range to a
single firewall. Hence, the connection is never load balanced.
2) You have to use the "firewall cluster" function, use HA, and
add a virtual IP to the load balancers. That's clean but hard.
In either case ; you need a good knowledge of the FP platform. ;(
============================================================================
====
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================