-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Witty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC
All,
For reasons beyond my control, I must allow remote management of some
DMZ servers, from my inTRAnet to one of my web-farm DMZs. I'd hope to
force everyone to standardize on a single remote admin application,
however. Right now, my choices are pcAnywhere, VNC, or Windows2000 WTS.I know that VNC has had tons of problems, vulnerabilities, etc., so I'm
pretty much going to try to weed that one out first.Next, is pcAnywhere - I know it can support menial encryption methods,
and can do dual user auth, which is good, but is it better than.....The third choice is W2k WTS - It's free, fast, and comes with W2K
Server, but I know NOTHING about it's security. All I know is it runs
on TCP 3389, but I don't have any clue if it has secure communications
capabilities (encryption), etc. Any ideas or opinions? Thanks very
much.Jason
Title: RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC
Does
anyone know pro's or con's about Control-It (Remotely Possible)? Any performance
or vulnerability issues?
Thanks,
Jim
- Re: [FW1] fw stop/start the only way to... Richard van Drimmelen
- Re: [FW1] fw stop/start the only wa... Richard van Drimmelen
- Re: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC Bill McCabe
- RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC andrew . 2 . shore
- RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC Brian Aust
- RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC Darrin Johansen
- RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC andrew . 2 . shore
- RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC Nijs, Daniel
- RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC Darrin Johansen
- RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC Patrick Baird
- Gadrow, Jim
