Joe,
Can I apply from your remarks that the SonicWall does NOT work with FW1
SP3? If I am correct, what problems are there?
Bob
>From: "Joe Voisin (FW1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'Conrad Chircop'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David E.
>Hoobler Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "FW-1 Mailing List (E-Mail)"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [FW1] VPN products compatible with Firewall-1
>Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:39:50 -0400
>
>
>Why not take a look at the SonicWall Tele2? That will allow 5 IP's behind
>it. And it can connect to a FW-1 using Manual IPSec and IKE (assuming you
>weren't crazy and applied SP3 to FW-1)...
>
>Joe
>
>(I have 2 of these now and another going in another office, they work GREAT
>and they are cheap (515 USD).
>
>=====================================================================
>Joseph Voisin, Systems and Network Administrator, Engel Canada Inc.
>www.engelmachinery.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (519)836-0220 x436
>=====================================================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: Conrad Chircop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:39 AM
>To: David E. Hoobler Jr.; FW-1 Mailing List (E-Mail)
>Subject: RE: [FW1] VPN products compatible with Firewall-1
>
>
>
>
>Might be an expensive option but you might consider the
>Security Appliances by Intrusion or Nokia.
>
>Regards
>
>Conrad Chircop
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>David E. Hoobler Jr.
>Sent: 23 April 2001 21:58
>To: FW-1 Mailing List (E-Mail)
>Subject: [FW1] VPN products compatible with Firewall-1
>
>
>
>I am running Checkpoint Firewall-1 VPN Gateway 250 version 4.1 SP3 at the
>office. I would like to set up a VPN from home. I can and have done so
>with SecureClient from a single computer with a public IP address.
>
>I have a network at home and would like to access the office network using
>multiple computers with private (RFC1918) IP addresses. I understand that
>SecureClient can be configured to use a private IP address, but you are
>limited to a single machine behind the NAT device. I would like to have
>multiple machines behind the NAT device be part of the VPN.
>
>The obvious thing to do is to use a minimum version of Checkpoint at home.
>I looked into that and found the cost to be prohibitive. Are there any
>other products out there that can remotely interface with Checkpoint's VPN?
>My first choice would be a Linux based firewall.
>
>Thanks,
>David Hoobler
>
>
>
>============================================================================
>====
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>============================================================================
>====
>
>
>
>
>============================================================================
>====
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>============================================================================
>====
>
>
>================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>================================================================================
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
