|
Hi all!, Last weekend someone did a scan to our firewall and found
port 264 and 265 opened. Those ports are "Check Point VPN-1 Public Key
Transfer Protocol" and "Check Point VPN-1 SecuRemote
Topology Requests" and belong to the first implied rule: Checkpoint
Control Connections. My question is: Does those ports represent a security
problem? We don't use VPN yet, so, I don't need them. But to close
those ports I will need to eliminate the Checkpoint Control Connections implied
rule, and recreate it manually, as first rule. Does anyone know if this is recommendable? Which reasons may I have to keep the configuration as it is
now, with those ports open to the world? Thanks a lot, Alnz. Ing. Alonzo Vera Rojas Consultor en Seguridad de Redes Cosapi Soft S.A. Av. Javier Prado Este 4491-Surco. Lima 33, Per�. Tel�fonos: (511) 3133200 anx 234; Fax: (511)
437-1606; Nextel:
81.22612 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cosapisoft.com.pe ����������������������������������� The
truth is out there... |
- Re: [FW1] Opened port at Firewall-1 Alonzo Vera
- Re: [FW1] Opened port at Firewall-1 Carl E. Mankinen
- Re: [FW1] Opened port at Firewall-1 Tim Holman
- RE: [FW1] Opened port at Firewall-1 McCammon, Keith
- Re: [FW1] Opened port at Firewall-1 gue
