On Sep 22, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Gavin Vess wrote:
However, given timelines, availability, etc., I'm inclined to think that Art's proposal represents our most likely path to successfully improving ZF's logging facilities in time for ZF 1.0. If we all focus on making specific changes and improvements to the existing flyweight Zend_Log by helping with Art's proposal, we can bend Zend_Log into something more flexible and closer to "standards" (e.g. log4j) without actually doing any "wave-making" changes. As adoption of ZF increases, some will want a full implementation of log4j, but given Andi's direction on getting closure with ZF 1.0, perhaps we can think about a "full" implementation after shipping 1.0.
This sounds like the most practical way to proceed. Design discussion continued in the proposal then:
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Log+Dynamic -- Willie Alberty, Owner Spenlen Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spenlen.com/
