Here are a few more examples of renaming the top-level class/sub-class names:
Zend_Acl_Role => Zend_Acl_Role_Role Zend_Acl_Resource => Zend_Acl_Resource_Resource Zend_Cache => Zend_Cache_Cache Zend_Cache_Backend => Zend_Cache_Cache_Backend_Backend Zend_Db => Zend_Db_Db Zend_Db_Profiler => Zend_Db_Profiler_Profiler Zend_Db_Select => Zend_Db_Select_Select Zend_Db_Statement => Zend_Db_Statement_Statement Zend_Db_Adapter_Oracle => Zend_Db_Adapter_Oracle_Oracle Zend_Db_Table_Row => Zend_Db_Table_Row_Row Zend_Locale_Data => Zend_Locale_Data_Data ... ... As you can see, it's just the top-level class/sub-class names that are getting renamed while the directories are getting more and more organized. For instance, currently the Zend/Db/Adapter/Db2, Zend/Db/Adapter/Oracle and Zend/Db/Table/Row folders have just one file each: Exception.php. After the change, they would additionally have Db2.php, Oracle.php and Row.php - relevantly. It's like taking the PEAR naming-convention to the next (Java packages) level. Regards, On 2/27/07, Art Hundiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Really no need to tell if a given name represents a package or not. Zend ..Filter ....Filter.php contains Zend_Filter_Filter ....Alpha.php contains Zend_Filter_Alpha So the only change is the name of the top level class in a package. The autoload routine remains unchanged. And of course if there was a module that was more or less independent from the other filter modules (perhaps some code for a specific language) then you could make is a subpackage. It really does make sense and except for doubling up some of the top level class names has no impact on the current design. Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > >> The problem is that in Zend/ directory there are a lot of php files: > > Ok, there is. Why it is a problem though? > >> It would be much better to move them to: >> Acl/Acl.php > > Ok, and Zend_Acl_Adapter would be in Acl/Adapter/Adapter.php or in > Acl/Adapter.php? If the former - how it's not directory per file? If the > latter, why Zend_Acl gets subdirectory and Zend_Acl_Adapter not and how > one is to know that by the name? > >> So this means that all package files would be in package directory. If u >> need only one package u take the package directory. > > How do I know Zend_Foo_Bar_Baz is a package or part of Zend_Foo_Bar > package or part of Zend_Foo package? > >> If file is in a directory - it is in package, and u know package >> name[directory name] > > How do I know the directory name? You seem to have different rules for > "packages" and "not packages" but I fail to see how do you know the name > is package or not. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Request-for-feedback%3A-moving-Zend.php-to-Zend-Zend.php-tf3290016s16154.html#a9190465 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
