Hi, I have a few question about what the naming scheme will look like now that Php 5.3 and namespaces is here. I've looked a bit at Zend_Application and how that component is structured.
1. Should all base level classes be moved? So that for instance, a class such as Zend_View should instead be called Zend_View_View? 2. Should it be Zend_Db_Table_Row_RowAbstract or Zend_Db_Table_RowAbstract? When is it appropriate to create subfolders, or "subpackages"? 3. When there is an abstract class, but no real need for a concrete one, should an empty conrete class exist anyway? For instance, should there be an empty Zend_Db_Table_Row extending Zend_Db_Table_RowAbstract? Currently this seems to be the case in some instances. Is this only to make the class name shorter? Just curious so I know how to best structure my own library! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-will-the-naming-scheme-look-with-Php-5.3-namespaces--tp24737377p24737377.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
