I guess I don't see how comparing the two is "totally flawed". You should compare solutions for the dimensions that matter to your use case--in the case of large indices, performance will undoubtedly be one of those dimensions. I had a similar experience with Zend_Search_Lucene and concluded that Apache Solr was orders of magnitude more suitable to enterprise solutions.
For a blog or small index, Zend_Search_Lucene is fine, however. That's not to disparage it in any way. PHP is just not well-suited for these kinds of things. -Matt On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Latter <dan.lat...@gmail.com>wrote: > Yeah, it compares PHP to Java which > In itself is totally flawed, but I'm sure more smarter people will > articluate this better than me. So hold tight. > > > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 05:18, ctx2002 <ctx2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> i try use zend lucene as my site search engine, then i have found this >> article, >> >> >> http://dadabase.de/weblog/archives/2009/07/22/recommendation-dont-use-zend-php-lucene >> . >> >> can any one say something about that article? >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/zend-lucene-tp25919568p25919568.html >> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>
