Thats pretty much how i do it - even for small stuff like one-off static pages. Its just easier in my work flow and that way i have a record of everything done and a continuous backup without having to trying to figure out if i need to revert to "site_old_1", "site_old_2" or "site_old_3" :-)
Never really use continuous integration though. humansky wrote: > > According to either tool, CruiseControl and Xinc, there is a component > I'm missing, SCM. Since I'm the only developer, I never thought of > using something like Subversion or CVS, but now I think I should > rethink my strategy. Do most people use the following programming > model (pardon the horrible ASCII art), even if they are the only > developer: > > Local copy of code <------> Local Apache(or IIS)/PHP > | > | > -> SCM (Subversion, CVS, etc) > | > | > -> CruiseControl/phpUnderControl or Xinc -----> Dev Server > ----> QA Server ------> Front Ends 1 & 2 > > > Thank you, > Henry > > On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Michael Kliewe wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the last commit to Xinc is from 2008. >> >> I prefer CruiseControl + phpUnderControl for my PHP projects. >> http://phpundercontrol.org >> >> Then you are able to automate deployment (where you can automate >> things like removing a webserver from the pool, deploy the new files >> to that server, and bring it back into the pool etc.) >> >> Michael >> >> On Nov 18, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Daniel Latter wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have not used it but you may want to look at : xinc integtration >>> server (http://code.google.com/p/xinc/) >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> 2009/11/18 Henry Umansky <human...@gmail.com> >>> Hello all, >>> This is not a question regarding ZF per se, I just want to know how >>> others would handle the same situation. Currently I was given a >>> task to develop a PHP ZF app on a Windows Server 2k8 running IIS7. >>> Problem is that I'm using Mac Leopard and connecting to windows >>> using SMB through the Zend Studios 6.1 IDE. This process is >>> painfully slow, every key stroke takes about 3-5 seconds to >>> register and connecting to SMB before I open ZS is an extra step I >>> would like to cut out. I've isolated the problem to Zend Studios, >>> since other text editors like TextWrangler or Komodo Edit are fine. >>> So my question is this, how are others connecting to windows >>> servers and developing PHP/ZF applications and what IDEs do they >>> use and what connection protocol does your organization allow? >>> >>> Also, on a side note, does anyone know of a tool that will allow me >>> to easily package and migrate my application from development >>> server ---> QA server ----> finally the two load balanced >>> production server? The old method of connecting to all three via >>> SMB and using the drag and drop method is getting old and I want to >>> minimize downtime. Right now I can do each front-end independently, >>> but there is about a 5-10 second lag until our load balancer >>> detects the 500 error, and sends traffic to the other front-end, >>> when I copy the folders over. I guess it ultimately comes down to, >>> is there an rsync equivalent to windows if so, what is it? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Henry >>> >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/PHP-%2B-IIS-%2B-SMB-%2B-Zend-Studios--tp26408291p26415132.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
