Nice to have.

Regards,
Saša Stamenković


On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Shaun Farrell <farrel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Steven,
> I would like to see this too!
> I like Zend_VersionControl_*
>
> Look forward to see it something.
>
> Shaun J. Farrell
> Washington, DC
> (202) 713-5241
> www.farrelley.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Danny Fröberg <
> danny.frob...@foreststar.net> wrote:
>
>>  Steven,
>>
>> Yes would love to have it, use case could be for having self updating apps
>> deployed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Danny
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Steven Brown [mailto:ste...@yewchube.com]
>> *Sent:* den 18 mars 2010 22:59
>> *To:* fw-general@lists.zend.com
>> *Subject:* [fw-general] Would anyone want Zend_VersionControl_Subversion?
>>
>>
>>
>> For fun, I began experimenting with putting together a PHP implementation
>> of a Subversion client that uses the svn protocol and thought it might be a
>> useful addition to ZF.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Karwin pointed out that a PECL extension already exists to provide
>> this functionality, though the documentation is filled with warnings about
>> it being experimental.
>>
>>
>>
>> I suggest that it is possible in some hosting environments that developers
>> won’t have the PECL extension installed and may not be able to install it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Some uses for such a module include:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.       Deployment – code can be installed or updated using PHP code
>>
>> 2.       Repository browsing – for tools such as bug/issue trackers
>>
>> 3.       Committing – for example if files can be changed in an admin
>> area, the changes can be committed to the repository
>>
>>
>>
>> I think it should be possible to provide similar functionality for Git,
>> Mercurial, and other version control systems.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have already started developing an adapter that uses the svn protocol,
>> but others could be created that use SSH or LDAP/HTTP access, or the PECL
>> extension.
>>
>>
>>
>> Would Zend_VersionControl_Subversion be useful or is it just a waste of
>> time?
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Steven
>>
>
>

Reply via email to