Hi Yue,
There is a milestone release of 2.0. Should you use it? I would not
use it for a real application anytime soon.. 1.x is still the tried,
tested, and truely stable release to use for app development.
The API is and will be over the next few milestones a moving target.
After it has been finalized we'll be working on migration tools and
compatibility layers.
More info on it here, including the current codebase as well as dev
milestones and dev documents linked:
http://devzone.zend.com/article/12385
Cheers,
Ralph
On 8/30/10 11:44 AM, Yue Yuanyuan wrote:
do we have the download version of 2.0 now? When could it be available?
If there are big changes, should I continue using 1.x?
Thank you.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:34 PM, dbenjamin <bd.web...@gmail.com
<mailto:bd.web...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I have some question regarding project structure with ZF 2 and the
namespaces.
It seems that with ZF 2 you wish to keep the PEAR conventions where each
part of a namespace corresponds to a node into directory structure.
But even
with ZF1, if we look at a default project structure, the ZF
autoloader maps
some basic namepaces to directories into the project, so it's not really
PEAR-like, or we should have something like :
Application/
Controller/
Index.php <-- class Application_Controller_Index
instead of :
application/
controllers/
IndexController.php <-- class IndexController
I was wondering if you planned to keep going that way or planned to
propose
a new project structure which fit better with these conventions ?
br,
Benjamin.
--
View this message in context:
http://zend-framework-community.634137.n4.nabble.com/ZF-2-and-project-structure-tp2400401p2400401.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
