Quick update: surprisingly, I found a bug on my end.
For anyone interested: I was getting and manipulating body text (via
$mail->getBodyText(true)) which I didn't realized was already encoded. So it
ended up being encoded twice.
Cheers,
m.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Marian Meres <marian.me...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I have run into two strange problems using Zend_Mail (UTF-8) over SMTP
> transport. Both look like obvious bugs which seems quite unlikely...
>
> ---> First one:
>
> $mail = new Zend_Mail('UTF-8');
> $mail->setBodyText("Příliš žluťoučký kůň úpěl ďábelské ódy");
>
> The above email is received like this:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Disposition: inline
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> P=3DC5=3D99=3DC3=3DADli=3DC5=3DA1
> =3DC5=3DBElu=3DC5=3DA5ou=3DC4=3D8Dk=3D=
> C3=3DBD k=3DC5=3DAF=3DC5=3D88 =3DC3=3DBA=3D=0Ap=3DC4=3D9Bl
> =3DC4=3D8F=3D=
> C3=3DA1belsk=3DC3=3DA9 =3DC3=3DB3dy
>
> Where the header is defined correctly (utf-8, quoted printable), but the
> body don't seem to be. First, it's slightly different as with using php
> native 'quoted_printable_encode', which I would not consider as a problem by
> itself (different line width/eol settings possibly?), but also gmail thinks
> it's not ok, as I can't read it in gmail...
>
> Is this a Zend_Mime::encodeQuotedPrintable bug?
>
> ---> Second one (explicitly define body as base64):
>
> $mail = new Zend_Mail('UTF-8');
> $mail->setBodyText("Příliš žluťoučký kůň úpěl ďábelské ódy", null,
> Zend_Mime::ENCODING_BASE64);
>
> This one is received like this:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Disposition: inline
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> UMWZw61sacWhIMW+bHXFpW91xI1rw70ga8WvxYggw7pwxJtsIMSPw6FiZWxza8OpIMOzZHk=
> =3D
>
> Where the header is wrong (defined as "quoted-printable" instead of
> expected "base64"). The content seems to be encoded ok, but as it is defined
> as quoted-printable I can't read it again.
>
> Any light in the dark would be highly appreciated, thanks in advance!
>
> M.
>
>
