On 6 February 2014 14:59, Greg <dev...@gmail.com> wrote: > My first impression is that the route event should only return a route > matched (SRP?); its simpler and would allow the route match to be retrieved > from the service manager without needing a route event (or if there is no > matched route). The service manager could then have a default route match > configured, 404 ?. >
Gosh, no! This is totally off-topic, please don't drag discussions about further development here :P
