hello,

first off, SPA is pretty neat and it's great to see the 2.0 release in
C -- i'm looking forward to getting all the GPG stuff working.

however, it concerns me that all the machines running this report
fwknopd as consuming a fair amount of resources, continuously. for
example (top excerpt, 7 day uptime):

%CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
0.7  0.4  46:37.31 fwknopd
0.0  0.4   0:00.01 sshd
0.0  0.4   0:00.12 bash
0.0  0.3   0:02.77 systemd
0.0  0.3   0:00.00 sshd
0.0  0.2   0:53.38 ntpd
0.0  0.2   0:00.00 sshd
0.0  0.2   0:03.81 avahi-daemon

... this server is almost 100% idle right now (in fact, Linode panel
shows less than 1MiB *total* traffic in 5 days ... couple ssh sessions
only).  fwknopd uses a consistent 0.3-0.9% CPU at all times,
interrupting frequently.  same results on ARMv7 pandaboard. strace
shows rapid nanosleep() + poll() loop:

[...]
nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL)          = 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}], 1, 0)     = 0 (Timeout)
nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL)          = 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}], 1, 0)     = 0 (Timeout)
nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL)          = 0
poll([{fd=4, events=POLLIN}], 1, 0)     = 0 (Timeout)
[...]

... how can this be remedied?  bleh, i also had a related questions
but it's escaping me for now ...

thanks,

-- 

C Anthony

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Fwknop-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fwknop-discuss

Reply via email to