On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 12:28:49PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:

> Fine rules for JAPH version 1.0.  

This is all well and good, but the JAPH that can be
specified is not the true JAPH. 

We've had JAPHs in combined perl and postscript. JAPHs 
that print out "Just another Perl / Unix Hacker" which
require the addition of "Unix" and Unix to work! Others
that are merely aesthetically pleasing, but entirely
straightforward.

-- 
Neil Kandalgaonkar, ActiveState
ASPN - ActiveState Programmer Network
http://ASPN.ActiveState.com/

Reply via email to