On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 12:28:49PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > Fine rules for JAPH version 1.0. This is all well and good, but the JAPH that can be specified is not the true JAPH. We've had JAPHs in combined perl and postscript. JAPHs that print out "Just another Perl / Unix Hacker" which require the addition of "Unix" and Unix to work! Others that are merely aesthetically pleasing, but entirely straightforward. -- Neil Kandalgaonkar, ActiveState ASPN - ActiveState Programmer Network http://ASPN.ActiveState.com/
- Re: World's First JAPH Ian Phillipps
- Re: World's shortest JAPH (was: first) Sven Neuhaus
- Re: World's shortest JAPH (was: first) John Porter
- Re: World's shortest JAPH (was: first) Sven Neuhaus
- Re: World's First JAPH Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: World's First JAPH Andrew . Savige
- Re: World's First JAPH Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: World's First JAPH Abigail
- Re: World's First JAPH Ilmari Karonen
- Re: World's First JAPH Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: World's First JAPH Neil Kandalgaonkar
- Re: World's First JAPH Keith C. Ivey
- Re: World's First JAPH Abigail
- Re: World's First JAPH Newton, Philip
- Re: World's First JAPH Paul Johnson
- Re: World's First JAPH Abigail
- Re: World's First JAPH Newton, Philip
- Re: World's First JAPH Andrew . Savige
- Re: World's First JAPH John Porter
- Re: World's First JAPH Steve Lane
- Re: World's First JAPH Jas Nagra
