On Sat, 2001-12-15 at 10:22, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > Ah, interesting. I could see an argument where this would *not* be > > considered a bug > > ?
http://archive.develooper.com/perl5-porters%40perl.org/msg60352.html > > but...has it been fixed in bleadperl, then? > > Yep. Excellent -- thanks! David -- David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 15726394 Yahoo!: dew7e Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
