On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 03:43:38PM -0800, Peter Scott wrote:
> Seems that it can be extended to arbitrary operators without losing 
> any conciseness:

So, who's gonna go to the obvious next level and give us an ofuscated
FORTH implementation, plus a decent JAPH in FORTH?

-- 
I've looked at the listing, and it's right!
                -- Joel Halpern

Reply via email to