Stephen Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -n $==$.&1;$=^=7 > ...y*yuoeia***ord > for/./g;$=||print 50 ivey > > > This one looks interesting, but I can't make it work. Is there a > typo?
Yes, we've run into this before. Some mail program along the way added a dot at the beginning of the second line, and then did it again in your message. There should be only one dot there. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC
