Ton Hospel wrote: > > In article <a6913g$k06$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes: > > Mm, I'm not sure all last results were processed, but the post-mortem > > is on the site, so here we go. > > > > MTV was very close I see. With a simple transformation he's at 47: > > > > -l $_=pop;s;.;print,s,,$&*1.11%10if/\G../,eg;eg > > And here's a 46: > -l $_=pop;s;.;print,s,,$&*1.11%10if/../g,eg;eg
And a 46 with a better tiebreaker value: -l $_=pop;s;.;print,s,,/../g&&$&*1.11%10,eg;eg since the precedence problem that needed the 'if' construct is no longer there. -- Rick Klement
