On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Stephen Turner wrote: > > If anyone was wondering why I was doing such an odd thing, I was trying to > see how much I could shorten this sort of idea: > print$_=pop,$/;s/./$&>9)+$&).($&-9*($&+/g;/\(.*\)/&&exec$ >
Sorry, that got munged by my mailer. It should read print$_=pop,$/;s/./$&>9)+$&).($&-9*($&+/g;/\(.*\)/&&exec$^X,$0,eval$& -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01
