On 30/10/2002 09:38:04 "Steffen Mueller" wrote: [snip] > >That code looks okay. There remains one issue I'm not quite sure about >myself: >(same conventions for the token names and types as in the original post) > >uAvBw -> uxvxw, where the x's may be different x's. > >This is intuitively context-sensitive (but not quite complying to the >spec of uAv -> uxv). In the sense of all terminals on the left side >being preserved. But handling that is hard, IMO anyway. > >How would you handle such a beast for any number of >terminal-nonterminal-terminal-... combinations? >
Isn't it possible to reduce that to two separate cases of uAv -> uxv My recollection of this stuff is a bit hazy :-( Can anybody recommend a (preferably online) refresher ? -- Csaba R�duly, Software Engineer Sophos Anti-Virus email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sophos..com US Support: +1 888 SOPHOS 9 UK Support: +44 1235 559933
