On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:00:19AM +0100, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:22:54PM -0500, Yanick Champoux wrote: > > Somehow, I think Philippe knew that. ;-) > > Even better, I knew I didn't need them.
I knew you knew. :-) I was more saying "Philippe knows that it's not really one operator but a bag o' various stuff (as the parenthesizing shows)". > Do you think I would have submitted a starfighter that looked like this? > > =(<>=~) Only if you would have called it "Tie Bomber with a sidecar". > > So we had the spaceship operator, and now the flaming x-wing... Hmmm... > > I'm beginning to suspect that the '@' sigil doesn't stand for a moon, after > > all... > > That's no moon! It's a space station. Heh. That's the quote I had in mind too. But now that a Space 1999 reference has been made, I'm desperatly trying to come up with an Eagle operator. Alas, so far the best I can find is $wooooosh =~ mm==mo which is pretty sad. :-/ Joy, `/anick