On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:00:19AM +0100, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:22:54PM -0500, Yanick Champoux wrote:
> > Somehow, I think Philippe knew that. ;-)
>
> Even better, I knew I didn't need them.
I knew you knew. :-) I was more saying "Philippe knows that
it's not really one operator but a bag o' various stuff (as the
parenthesizing shows)".
> Do you think I would have submitted a starfighter that looked like this?
>
> =(<>=~)
Only if you would have called it "Tie Bomber with a sidecar".
> > So we had the spaceship operator, and now the flaming x-wing... Hmmm...
> > I'm beginning to suspect that the '@' sigil doesn't stand for a moon, after
> > all...
>
> That's no moon! It's a space station.
Heh. That's the quote I had in mind too. But now that a Space
1999 reference has been made, I'm desperatly trying to come up with
an Eagle operator. Alas, so far the best I can find is
$wooooosh =~ mm==mo
which is pretty sad. :-/
Joy,
`/anick